踢车帮
Kicking Cars >
只为爱车的你！
only for you who love cars!
踢车问答
踢车帮的小伙伴们
本周《踢车问答》的5个问题已到
有请踢车夏东来为大家答疑吧！
> > >. > > >/span > >
< strong > > >. < strong > > >. >
本周入选的5个问题如下
The five questions selected this week are as follows:
问题 1
阿苏13238324833：如果一辆车的保险和年检到期了，不买保险也不年检，对车辆有什么影响，车牌会不会过期报废？如果在路上发生交通事故，本来是对方的责任，但是会不会因为没买保险和年检而变成是自己的责任？
答：会的，因为己方是违法在先。也就是，因为，从你这一方看，是先有了己方的违法上路，后发生的交通事故。但针对这起事故，这并非简单的因果关系，因为对方在犯错误时，你这辆车是否通过年检本身并不一定导致了他在驾驶当时犯错。也就是这辆没有年检的车，如果当时是正常的行驶，没有违反交通规则，那么在对方司机眼里，它跟一辆年检合规的车，并没有区别。
所以，对方司机该承担的责任，还是要承担的。而你，则要承担另外的违法责任，就是，驾驶因为没有年检而失去上路资格的车上路。保险，分成商业保险和强制第三者保险。只有强制第三者保险是必须上的，商业保险自愿选择。假如你没有上“交强险”，就得按照法规，自己承担一定的损失，即使是对方的责任。
Insurance, divided into commercial insurance and compulsory third-party insurance. Only compulsory third-party insurance, voluntary commercial insurance. , if you don't get into “span” insurance, you will have to bear some of the damages, even the liability of the other party, in accordance with the statute.
说点儿额外的话。人天生会做对自己有利的事儿，但经常会选择错误。当我们仔细琢磨什么叫“对自己有利”呢？会发现，真的无法定义。其实就是，你的意识决定你的行为，而只要这个行为做出来，那么当时决定这个行为的意识，就是认为该行为对自己“有利”。即使是牺牲、奉献，也是“利”之所在。这是广义的，成了哲学议题。絮叨了。
"Span" says something extra. People are born to do what is good for themselves, but they often choose mistakes. When we think about what is good for ourselves, it's hard to define. In fact, your consciousness determines what you do, and as long as it is done, then the consciousness that determines it is good for you. Even sacrifice and dedication is what is good for you. This is a broad, philosophical subject.
狭义上说的“利”无非是“得”，已经获得的，不能失去。没有的或者少的，要有要增多，关键是比别人多获得少付出。不去给车年检和上保险，多半是基于这种本能吧。
The word "profit" in the narrow sense of the word "span" is nothing but "yes" and has been acquired and cannot be lost. The only thing that's missing, or less, is to increase it, it's to pay less than anyone else. It's mostly based on this instinct that you don't have to go to annual tests and insurance.
在赌台上作弊，在现实社会违法，内在的逻辑是相同的，就是风险与所对应的利益之比。日常生活中，人总是忍不住要“灵活”一点儿，不那么精确刻板地照规矩来。这也是要设立规矩的原因，它标明一个基准，让人类在群居的时候，不至于陷入混乱。
The logic inherent in cheating on a gambling table, illegal in a real society, is the same: risk versus the corresponding interest. In everyday life, people always have to be “flexible” and less rigid. That's why the rules are set, so that when humans live together, they don't fall into chaos.
偶尔或者不时地少许偏离，只要有个限度，及时纠正则可，有其天然的合理性。比如，从右侧超车，比如限速60，没有监控的路段又空旷，偷偷跑个80之类的。但是，选择不年检不上保险地使用汽车，就是个长期持续地违法了，风险是确定的。它能带来什么利益吗？省了个年检的事儿？强制保险的费用？相对风险，这点儿好处都太少。
车已经太老旧，根本没法通过年检，偷着用获利，这种行为在不发达的，监管松懈的地方常见。在发达地区少见甚至近于绝迹，这本身也说明问题。就是，只有在欠发达地区，这种“风险利益比”，才是有吸引力的。
The "span" car is too old to pass an annual inspection and to be used for profit, which is common in underdeveloped and poorly regulated areas. It's rare or close to extinction in the developed regions, which explains the problem. That is, it is only in the less developed regions that this “risk interest ratio” is attractive.
问题 2
解江涛：夏老师，能否回答一下“四驱”和“前驱”的区别，主要驾驶感受有何差别。四驱费油，能比两驱多费多少油？应该不至于就多费一倍油吧。电动车和燃油车相比，电机可直接放置在后部，少了传动轴损耗，理论上电动后驱和前驱能量损耗是不是就完全一样了。
Can you answer the difference between a "four-drive" and a "forward-drive" for the main driving? Four-drilled oils, how much more oil than two? Shouldn't it cost twice as much. Electric cars can be placed directly in the back, less power-axis losses, and in theory, exactly the same amount of power-drilling losses.
答：根本的理解点是“牵引力”，就是轮胎带动汽车沿着方向机指定的方向前进的有效动力。这个词的原词是Traction，也可以叫做：循迹力。循什么迹呢，方向盘所指定的轨迹，等同于驱动轮的轮胎旋转时，向地面用力的相反方向。轮胎把发动机的动力作用的地面上，获得推动车前进的反作用力。
它靠的是胎面与地面的摩擦力。这个摩擦力，在车轮旋转的方向上，被叫做牵引力，你可以看成是“纵向”，在与旋转方向偏离的“横向”上，被叫做“抓地力——Grip”。
It's based on the friction of the tread and the ground. This friction, in the direction of the wheel, is called to pull gravity. You can see it as “vertical” and, in the “horizontal” of deviation from the direction of rotation, it's called “capture—Grip”.
这样，就会看出来，前轮驱动的车，它的牵引力只能让前轮来承担，四驱，就是前后轮都有。那么相同的发动机动力，分给四个车轮，每个车轮的负担，就比前轮驱动的少50%。这是个粗算，其实现在都是可变的，能更精确地对应每个车轮与它下面这块路面的情况。当车轮的负担降低了，地面的负担也降低了，也就是，它俩之间的摩擦力负担降低了。
In this way,
摩擦力是有极限的，超过了就打滑，也就是车轮空转，地面也就无法提供推动车前进的反作用力。显然，四驱就是有更大的空间去获取这个反作用力，避免打滑。它是为更有效地获取牵引力而存在的。
There's a limit to the friction, which goes beyond the slide, that is, the wheeling of the wheel, and the ground is unable to provide the counter-activities that drive the car forward. Clearly, the four-drives have greater space to capture the counter-activities and avoid slippage. It exists to make the pull more efficient.
于是，驾驶四驱车的感受是，比两驱车一个是快——加速快，过弯也快；一个是稳定性好，操控感觉更自信。其实是一回事的不同角度解读。油耗会相对高，一个是负重增大，更主要的是摩擦损耗增大。技术解决的焦点就在这里，现在已经控制得很好了。无法概论的是，技术、调校有差别，只能具体车型具体看。
So the feeling of driving a four-drive is that one is faster -- faster, faster than the other; one is more stable, more confident about manipulation. It's actually a different way of reading things. The fuel consumption is relatively high, and the one is more heavy and the friction loss is more intense. Here's the focus of the technology solution, which is now well controlled. In general, there are differences in technology, in calibrations, but only specific vehicle types.
最后，我觉得，电动后驱比电动前驱效率高。因为，前驱的话，会跟转向互相干涉。后驱能让分工更平衡。
In the end, I think it's more efficient to drive after electric power than before, because, in the first place, it interferes with each other. In the second, it makes the division of labour more balanced.
问题 3
范鹏：夏老师你好，请问下2020款迈腾330TSI领先版和宝马1系125i领先版M运动套装怎么选择（两车价格重叠部分很多），注重操控和座椅舒适性。期待您的回复，感激。
答：座椅舒适性，必须自己去试。这个与买衣服和鞋一样，不能委托给别人。我自己的身材，肯定是迈腾舒服的多。这俩车完全不是一个意思，你首先可能不是要所谓注重操控和舒适，而是更宏观一点儿的，这车你要怎么使用它。就是长期的使用场景是什么样的。
喜欢车的人多数都讲究操控，但就像喝酒，它有度数之分。绝大部分人，绝大部分生活场景下，操控是非常浅淡的程度。舒适才是重要的主体。即使生活在山区，盘山路是常态，操控也并不需要多么极致。说白了，以你考虑的这两款车，全都能超额完成任务。
Most of the people who like cars are manipulative, but it's like drinking. Most people, in most of their lives, are so lightly manipulated. Comfortable is the important subject. Even if you live in the mountains, the road is normal, and it doesn't have to be so extreme. Let's be clear, the two cars you've been thinking about are all over the job.
所以，在选择时，先把公约项去掉，就看出来应该选择谁了。
问题 4
Forever糖：夏老师，你们试的国产电动车中的底盘行驶品质和驾驶质感这些方面的感受和评价，能比的上同价位合资燃油或者电动车吗，或者差距有多少？比如唐、汉、p7、ES6、ES8这些电车或者混动版本，行驶质感和驾驶品质怎么样，称得上这价位吗？不太在乎内饰、配置这些花里胡哨的东西。
, your taste and evaluation of the bottom-drive and driving properties of the State-made electric vehicles are comparable to the above-priced joint fuel or electric vehicles, or are there any gaps?
答：首先，几乎看不见什么同价位的“合资电动车”。外国的电动车，要么特别贵，要么就没有，除了特斯拉有个Model 3。
> >, first of all, there is almost no equivalent value of a joint-venture electric vehicle. Foreign electric vehicles are either particularly expensive or not, except for Tesla's Model 3.
电动车的体验跟燃油车有明显差别，我的经验是，开电动车的，特别是比较高级电动车的人，几乎都不再愿意回来开燃油车了。我试驾的电动车不少，那些燃油车大牌，像奥迪、保时捷这样的，它们的电动车，也是明显表现出优越性。现在电动车还只是幼年期，就已经这么厉害，燃油车已经是炉火纯青，无路可走了。
There's a clear difference between the experience of electric cars and fuel cars, and my experience is that those driving electric cars, especially more advanced ones, are almost no longer willing to come back to drive fuel cars. I've tested a lot of electric cars, such as those with large fuel plates like Audi and Porsche, and their electric cars are clearly superior. They're still in their early years, and they're as good as they are, and the fuel trucks are pure and roadless.
至于价位，你说的这些电动车，都称的上这个价位。因为暂时来看，它们的电池成本仍然显著高过了燃油发动机。电动车新势力，都采用直销，不搞经销商网络，就是在从这里省成本来平衡制造成本。因此，给用户的都是大幅度让利，跟互联网公司初期烧钱逻辑相仿。
As far as the price is concerned, you say all these electric cars are worth the price. For the time being, their battery costs are still significantly higher than fuel engines. The new power of electric cars, using direct sales, and not running a network of distributors, is saving the cost of manufacturing from here. So, the user is making a great deal of money, the same logic as the initial burning of money as the Internet company.
你问题隐含的意思是考虑买电动车？我的建议是尽量考虑新款，跟买手机那样。汉，我还没体验过。ES6和P7是我体验过的车里，比较不错的SUV和轿车。求稳的话，ES6。因为P7太新了，可靠性还需要观察一下。
The implication of your question is to think about buying an electric car? My advice is to try to think about new money, like buying a cell phone. Han, I haven't experienced it. ES6 and P7 are the cars I've experienced. Better SUVs and cars. If I'm steady, ES6. Because P7 is so new, reliability needs to be observed.
问题 5
> Question 5
sun：关注斯巴鲁傲虎有一段时间了，请夏老师说说其四驱优势与普通合资、国产SUV到底好多少？其越野能力能否与采用非承载车身的霸道、帕杰罗等车型具可比性？旅行车在国内销售并不火，其旅行车的优势在哪里？
For some time now, Ms. Hsia has been focusing on Sparous Tigers, saying how good his four-way advantage is for common joint ventures and national production of SUV? Can his cross-country capability be compared to his non-car-carried hegemonics, Pajero, etc.? Where is the advantage of his travel vehicle when it is sold domestically?
答：它的四驱特色就是平衡性比较好，这种特色主要是以公路驾驶为出发点，而且主要是指弯道操控，冰雪防滑之类的情形。那么，针对高底盘车来说，这个优势就在想象中变得明显了，因为底盘在物理上是被抬高了，重心自然就比普通的旅行轿车高得多。这时，水平对置发动机，对称四驱的好处会明显一些。
但是，不能拿来跟非承载越野车比较，因为根本不是一回事。霸道、帕杰罗是用来实打实越野的车，那个四驱是用来攀爬和翻越的，尽管它也有防滑的作用，但在公路上，这俩车的平衡性、操控性，全都比轿车低得多。
But it can't be compared to non-carried Land Cruisers, because it's not the same thing at all. Heroes, Pajero, are used to hit the Land Cruisers. That four-drive is used to climb and flip, although it's also slippery, on the highway, they're all much less balanced and controlled than cars.
傲虎抬高底盘，只是要比轿车通过性好一些，能做到普通SUV那样的水平足够了。但它还是轿车承载式车身，不可能与非承载越野车的梯式钢梁相提并论。因此，基本上，无可比性。
"Span" lifts the chassis, but it's better than the sedan's pass than the ordinary SUV's. It's also a sedan carrying body. It's not comparable to a ladder beam that's not carrying a Land Cruiser. So, basically, it's not comparable.
傲虎是类似于A6 Allroad，V90 CC那种车，比A4 Allroad个头大一些，而价格却比它们都便宜很多。在它的定价档次上，基本没有同类车型。有的，就是SUV了。从通过能力上，在一个区间里。我认为傲虎的系统更专业，这是它品牌的硬核成分，买的就是这个嘛。
"Span" is a car like A6 Alload, V90 CC, bigger than A4 Alload, and cheaper than all of them. There's almost no similar type of car in its pricing. Some are SUVs. From the point of view, in a block. I think the system is more professional. It's a hard core component of its brand. That's what it buys.
旅行车的优势？可以说，没有优势。不然就不会“销售不火”了。事实上，旅行车是正在被SUV驱赶出市场的状态。欧洲人表现得对它最留恋，其它地方的消费者，则很痛快地拥抱SUV去了。咱们这儿，旅行车只能是“特殊兴趣”类车型。它有比较大而灵活可变的行李装载空间，以及笨拙但风格鲜明的外观，其它与轿车没有不同。
In fact, it is being driven out of the market by the SUV. Europeans are showing their greatest attachment to it, and consumers elsewhere are hugging it. Here we have only the "special interest" type of car. It has a larger and flexible baggage loading space, as well as a clumsy but distinct look. , other things are no different from cars.
本期踢车夏东给大家的问题
>. >....................................................................................................
上期问题的精彩留言
.
1.国产车历史短，目前品牌价值不高。很多普通消费者买车时候根本就不把它算做可选范围内。到了三十万以上价格段除了红旗，理想，蔚来也真没太多国产车可选的。特别不差钱的，除了红旗L5没有匹配价格的国产车，L5又不喜欢或者不够资格购买。 Many ordinary consumers buy cars without an option. More than 300,000 price bands have no choice but a red flag, ideal, and there's not much of a national car to choose from. Especially cheap, except red flags L5 , which does not match prices, and which does not like or qualify for purchase. L5 > /span >. > ordinary consumers, who care about economics and not extra configurations, whose state-owned technology is not very advanced and oil is too expensive. > br/ 3./span > used to give consumers the impression that prices are low, technology is poor, stability is poor, and a lot of problems.
1.我认为大多数碍于面子的原因花10多万为什么不买个合资呢。
I believe that most of the reasons for the lack of face cost more than 100,000 to buy a joint venture.
2.还是不太相信国产品牌的质量，即使你宣传的再好，有人还那种思想还是根深蒂固。
2. There is still little faith in the quality of the national product plate, and even if you promote it well, there are those who are deeply rooted in it.
3.长期以来合资都是给人很好的口碑，皮实耐用，特别是两田，虽然说合资车也发生过召回啥，但它长久以来的影响和形象在那里，还是会让人选择他们。
3. For a long time, joint ventures have been a good slogan and have a very long-term endurance, especially for the two fields. Although the joint ventures have also been recalled, their long-standing influence and image have allowed them to choose between them.
开了3个月15-20万价位的国产新能源汽车之后，我觉得这三个理由应该是： After 3 > > 15-20 multi-bit new energy vehicles, I think these three reasons should be: 1. brand recognition is not high enough; br/ > 2. >/span > inherently assumes that the low market position of most domestic vehicles may not be considered. >
1.观念陈旧，不了解目前好的国产车质量水平。
1. Stereotypes and lack of understanding of the current level of quality of national production vehicles.
2.销量大的部分国产车质量还是不够好，未超越同级别合资车。劣币驱逐良币，少数优秀国产车销量口碑不理想，不被人们熟知，不被人们了解。
2. The quality of some of the high sales is still not good enough to go beyond the same level of joint ventures.
3.无知者跟风从众，被黑子水军带节奏带歪了。
3. The ignorant follow the wind and the Dark Sons are pacing.
第一位的还是质量。虽说国产车都在不断的进步，但是在我我们这些40岁左右的人潜意识里，还有会某瑞某瑞，修车排队的顺口溜。
The first one is quality. Although the country's cars are progressing, in my mind, people around 40 years of age, there's someone who's going to fix cars and line up.
第二应该就是企业的稳定性。除了长安等一些大品牌，最近倒闭的如力帆、众泰，这些车企让人心里没底。
The second should be business stability. Apart from some big brands such as Chang-Am, these cars have recently collapsed like sails and crowds, and they're completely unsettled.
第三就是技术了。我有辆10年前的进口奔驰，有些功能居然去年还在被某国产车当卖点。似乎有些玩笑。
The third is technology. I have an imported Mercedes 10 years ago, some of which was sold last year by a national car. It's kind of a joke.
1、虚荣心，觉得国产车开出门掉面子，殊不知国产车已是突飞猛进。
1. The vanity of the country's produce car, which is seen as a surprise when it leaves its door open, is not known to the extent that it has entered the country.
2、思想还停留在以前，觉得国产车容易出现各种各样的问题，容易坏。
The idea remains the same, and it is felt that national production vehicles are prone to a variety of problems and vices.
3、从心里就排斥，觉得油耗高，行驶品质不行。作为一个把吉利帝豪开了21万公里没出现过抛锚在路上的车主，国产车已经不是当年的国产车，只要稍微有点汽车知识储备就能选到好的国产车。目前作为领克01车主，为国产车的雄起而自豪。
3 >/span >, ostracized from the heart, feeling that it's too fuely to travel. As a driver who drove 210,000 kilometres of Gillitius without ever getting anchored on the road, a national car is no longer the national car of the year, and a little bit of auto knowledge is available to pick up a good national car. At present, being the owner of the ox 01, he is proud to be the owner of the national car.
1.前车之鉴幡然醒悟。开了很多年的吉利，从以前偶发小毛病，到现在频发小毛病，且越来越多。这两年除了三大件没动，其他辅助零件几乎换了个遍。前些天上班还差点迟到，心累不爱。 . . . . . >/span's wakes up. For many years now. >.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
不买国产品牌的车，就我自己的感觉而言。第一，担心国产品牌车的可靠性和稳定性。第二，国产品牌车保值率普遍偏低，不想给自己大放血。第三，以我的社交圈来说感觉买国产品牌车开出去会稍显降格。
First, concern about the reliability and stability of a national product. Second, the national product car is generally low and does not want to bleed itself. Third, it's like, in my social circle, it's going down a little. /span > /span > /span /span /span /span >
不买国产车三个理由： The reason why did not buy a national car is because: 1. 
2.普通消费者，在乎经济性，不外乎配置，国产车技术目前确实不算领先，油耗偏高。如果买国产平时养车成本较高，不合适。
3.国产车以前给消费者的印象就是价格低廉，技术落后，稳定性差，小毛病多。虽然现在口碑好很多了，但是没有尝试的勇气，害怕受伤代价太大。
1.品牌认可度还不够高；
2.固有印象国产车就是小毛病多，可靠性差，异响之类的（只能说部分事实吧，开过的国产车不够多，没有足够的发言权，但是我觉得一部分国产车在三大件上已经足够优秀了；
3.在现在这种超前消费观念的时代，大家都偏向享受型消费，有一定的追求，因此大部分国产车偏低的市场定位，可能不是大家的考虑范围。
2.没钱怕买错所以从众。我们村就这种现状，手握十来万，看别人买个大众，日系，自己也买个，每次洗车擦车都亲自上阵。
3.爱面子要档次。很多村外的朋友觉得国产车档次低，技术不成熟。另一方面25万以上没什么国产车可选。再说有25万，BBA入门也挺香的，还省心。
1.面子
2.票子
3.质量我第一辆车就选择合资车没有买国产车的理由是：（14年）当时没有票子，就想买一辆省心的车，对国产车的质量不放心。所以选择一台小型车。现在马上有二宝了。想换车，有了一定的积蓄，换车不考虑国产车的理由是：我想要的价位国产车选择太少了。就像夏老师所说，国产车在低端市场非常有地位。现在不买国产车就是想要一台踏实有面子的车。所以票子现在允许我买国产车，但是面子上得不到满足。这样看来不选择国产车的理由已经很明确了。其实说实话我也想买国产车，支持国货，但是真的没有合适的车型供我选择。
2. 3. >/span's first car did not buy a national car because: 14 /span > did not buy a national car without a ticket at the time. So the ticket now allows me to buy a national car. With some savings, the reason why I don't think about a national car is too few. As Mr. Summer said, the national car is very well placed in the low-end market.
不买国产车的两个理由：
1.产品质量风险（包括安全性，驾驶舒适度，动力，油耗，零部件及内饰零件耐久度）
2.售后服务质量风险其实国产车的造型（外形+内饰）很多品牌已经做出过相当不错的设计，比如传奇GS8，领克01/03，包括红旗HS7，个人都觉得既有创新又很有设计美学上的高度，但就是硬核技术上，总给人不放心的刻板印象……身边的朋友也都没有过购买经历，除非身边有人长期体验过某款车，否则老有不敢买的感觉。
Two reasons for not buying a national car: 1. product quality risks (including safety, driving comfort, power, fuel consumption, spare parts and interior parts durability)
2. +/span) and many brands have made quite good designs, such as legends GS8 , collars >span >span 01/03 /span >, including red flags HS7 /span >.
个人观点不买国产车的几个原因:
There are several reasons why the individual view does not buy a national car:
1.合资汽车比国产三大件可靠性及耐久性还是要强一些,大家买车都图个省心省事
1. Joint ventures are still more reliable and durable than the three components of national production, and the purchase of cars is a provincial matter & nbsp;
2.国产车毕竟起步晚,在研发及生产初级阶段存在的不足或问题给国内带大了深远的负面影响
After all, the shortcomings or problems in the early stages of R & D and production in the home country have had far-reaching negative effects & nbsp;
3.国产车虽然越做越好,但需要进一步的开扩国内市场还需要一定时间的沉淀及各方面良好服务来优化口碑,或是改变国人对国产以往的负面影响。
3. . . . . >. . >. > >. . >. >. >..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1.老一辈还停留在国产车不好的观念上
2.觉得合资车各种好，身边就有很多
3.觉得合资有面子（个人不认可，国产车现在更帅）
1. >
> > feels the joint ventures are good, and there's a lot of
3. feels the joint ventures are better.
一个消费者，他不买国产品牌的原因？看到留言很多说是，面子，虚荣心，陈旧思想。我给的原因是第一是品质，第二还是品质，最后还是品质。你坐高铁你会觉得没有面子？我们可以看到，我们越来越多的领域拥有话语权。目前的实际情况就是确实还有很多领域人家比我们强，这是由客观历史，文化决定的。我们改革开放才多少时间？所以不要用面子，虚荣心去绑架，你牛逼，你做出好产品，一样可以得到国人认可，比如现在的手机，你看看周围，多少用的国产的品牌手机。安卓系统的，国产品牌就是最好的选择，汽车也一样，你把品质做出来，得到市场认可，比如保值率，可靠性。大家都是用自己的钱投票的，光说情怀没有用。
So how long do we reform and open up? So let's not use face, vanity, vanity, archaic ideas. I give it because it's quality, second or final or quality. You'll feel no face. We can see that more and more of us have the right to talk. The reality is that there are a lot of areas where people are better than us. It's based on objective history and culture.
我认为国人不买国产车的三个原因如下：
In my view, the three reasons why foreigners don't buy their own cars are as follows:
1.对汽车方面的相关知识和形势了解太少，买车前更多的是让身边的人推荐或是看周围什么品牌的车多就选哪个品牌，而不是自己上网查或是请教专业的汽车媒体人，而身边的人一般推荐的话除了大众就是“两田”了，这个也可以从帕萨特碰撞测试公布后销量不降反增就能看出来了，我估计买帕萨特的好多人都不知道有碰撞测试这么个东西。
There is too little knowledge of the relevant circumstances of automobiles, and it is more likely that people around them will choose which brands to recommend or look at, rather than go online or ask professional auto-mediars, who will generally recommend anything other than “two fields”, as can be seen from the increase in sales following the publication of the Pasart collision test, which I don't think many of the people buying Pasart have any idea of having a collision test.
2.合资品牌影响力高，品牌价值比国产品牌高，认为开合资车有面子，只要预算足够的话多数人都会选择合资车，因为在条件容许的情况下人们都会选择更好的。
2. The joint venture brand has a high impact and a higher brand value than a country's brand name plate. It is considered that it has a reputation to drive a joint venture, and most people will choose a joint venture as long as the budget is sufficient, since people will choose better when conditions permit.
3.耐久性，我认为这恰恰是最不重要的一个因素，因为现在很少有人买了车后会照着十几年二十年开的，一般也就七八年就会换车，而现在的国产品牌（以模仿为主的除外）的耐久性按照这个时间段来说是没问题的，甚至其综合实力都已超越了很多二线合资品牌了，但是很多消费者还不知道，说白了还是对国产品牌了解的太少了！
I think that's one of the least important factors, because now that few people buy a car, they'll be driving in more than 10 or 20 years, usually in more than 78 years, and the durability of the current national product plate (with the exception of mimicry) is not a problem at this time, and even its combined strength exceeds a lot of second-line joint brands, but many consumers don't know that it's too little to know about the national product plate!
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论