北京时间8月1日20时20分，一种被称为“比特币现金（BCC）”的区块链资产正式开始交易。这意味着，数字货币再迎关键时期。在BCC诞生后，其价格出现较大波动，比特币交易量一度显著下滑，部分比特币交易所暂停了存取业务。
On August 1, Beijing time, at 2020, a block-chain asset called Bitcoin Cash (BCC) formally started trading. This means that digital currencies are back to a critical period.
业内人士表示，BCC是一种新的数字资产，不应该将其与比特币混淆。海外舆论认为，该事件反映出虚拟货币正式普及所面临的课题。
According to industry, the BCC is a new digital asset that should not be confused with Bitcoin. Overseas public opinion believes that the event reflects the problems facing the official spread of virtual currency.
据OKCoin币行的分析师介绍，BCC区块链1日晚间成功在区块478559与主链分离，BCC首个区块由中国矿池Viabtc挖出，该矿池随后又挖出了下一个区块478560。第一个比特币现金区块大小为1915175字节，其中包含了6985笔交易。伴随“挖矿”的进行，BCC价格剧烈波动，一度从400美元的高位下跌到220美元附近。
According to an analyst at the OKCoin Bank, the BCC block chain was successfully separated from the main chain in block 478559 on the night of one day, and the BCC first section was dug out by the Chinese mine pond Viabtc, which then dug up the next block 478560. The first bitcoin cash block was 1915175 bytes, containing 6985 transactions. The BCC price fluctuated sharply, once falling from a high of $400 to around $220.
BCC的出现也给比特币走势带来一定影响。据OKCoin币行的报价，1日19时至20时，以人民币计价的比特币价格从19850元跌至17750元，下跌幅度高达10%。北京时间2日19时，比特币价格在18200元附近徘徊，以美元计价的比特币价格交投于2760美元附近。
According to the price quoted by OKCoin, between 1900 and 2000 hours on 1 January, the value of the currency in the renminbi fell from 1985 to 1775, a drop of up to 10%. At 1900 Beijing time, the price of the currency hovered around $18,200, and the price of the currency in the United States dollar fell around $2760.
伴随比特币区块扩容问题的出现，比特币社区有了不同的技术发展路线图。其中，BCC便是根据Bitcoin ABC方案产生的区块链资产。这一方案为保持协议稳定简单，去除了Segwit功能，支持将区块大小提升至8M。比特币和BCC之间的主要区别在于其交易速度以及短时间内的交易量。
With the problem of the expansion of the Bitcoin block, the Bitcoin community has a different road map for technological development. Among these, BCC is the block chain asset created under the Bitcoin ABC program. To keep the deal stable, this option is simple, removing Segwit functions and supporting the upgrading of blocks to 8M. The main difference between Bitcoin and BCC is the speed of their transactions and the volume of transactions over a short period of time.
此前，外界认为这将代表着比特币正式分裂。为了防止市场出现太大波动，不少比特币交易所都宣布暂停存取交易。7月31日，日本比特币交易所BTC box就暂停了比特币的存取业务。OKCoin币行也采取了类似措施，并于北京时间2日下午5时重新开放比特币充值与提币服务。两者都于BCC区块产生后开启了相关交易。
Prior to that, it was thought that this would represent a formal split in bitcoin. To prevent excessive market volatility, a number of Bitcoin exchanges suspended access transactions. On July 31, the BTC box of the Bitcoin exchange in Japan suspended access to bitcoin.
不过，OKCoin币行的分析师对上证报记者表示，BCC改变了比特币的技术初衷，采用了动态难度调整，是一种新的数字资产，未来的发展也和比特币关系不大，大家不应该混淆BCC和比特币。
However, the analyst at the OKCoin Bank told the newspaper reporter that BCC had changed the technical intent of Bitcoin by introducing a dynamic and difficult adjustment, that it was a new digital asset and that future developments were not relevant to Bitcoin, and that no one should confuse BCC and Bitcoin.
此外，类似BCC这样的数字货币并非第一次出现。上述分析师表示，在比特币最古老权威的Bitcointalk论坛上，出现过很多类似的新币。它们继承了比特币现有的区块链，每一个持有比特币的人都自然拥有这款新币。历史上，从未有人表示过此类新币是比特币的分叉币。所以，比特币网络分叉的叙述是不准确的。
Moreover, digital currencies such as BCC do not appear for the first time. According to the analysts, there are many similar new currencies at Bitcointalk, the oldest authority of Bitcoin.
日本共同社分析指出，此次事件源于各家企业围绕提高系统处理能力产生分歧，管理者的缺乏也是导致此次分歧产生的原因之一，这成为虚拟货币正式普及所面临的课题。
According to the JSC analysis, the incident arose from differences among enterprises over improving the system's handling capacity, and the lack of managers was one of the reasons for this disagreement, which became the subject of the formalization of the virtual currency.
目前，外界对数字货币有着不同看法。高盛首席技术分析师贾法里近日发表报告称，比特币价格可能在微幅震荡后重拾向上趋势，1856美元至1790美元这一区间有可能构成强力支撑。
At present, there are different perceptions of digital money. Goldman Sachs’ chief technical analyst Jaafari recently reported that bitcoin prices may be recovering upwards after microshocks, and that between $1856 and $1790 could be strongly supported.
橡树资本联席董事长霍华德·马克斯则认为，数字货币狂热只是毫无根基的跟风或者一场“金字塔骗局”。这些货币本身几乎没有任何价值，人们愿意支付多少它就有多少价值。不过，这样的情况也不是第一次发生。同样的说法也能用在1637年的郁金香狂热、1720年爆发的南海泡沫事件及1999年至2000年的互联网泡沫上。
The President of the Oak Capital Co-head, Howard Marks, argued that digital currency fanaticism was nothing but a trace or a “Pyramid fraud.” The money itself was of little value, and people were willing to pay as much as it was. But that was not the first time. The same could be said about the tulip fever of 1637, the South China bubble of 1720, and the Internet bubble of 1999-2000.
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论